
-
MUSEO VIII 006
Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza
MUSEO 2021 — 2023Authors know the fear of the blank page, the disÂapÂprovÂing blink of the cursÂor, frozen in place. PaintÂers know it too, the horÂror vacui, the panÂic when faced with the emptiÂness of a blank canÂvas. PhoÂtoÂgraphÂers tend not to because there is always a counter-image in the viewÂfindÂer. It doesn’t have to be beauÂtiÂful, but it’s there – unless of course, you forÂget to charge the batÂtery or forÂget the shutÂter cap. Of course, this would nevÂer hapÂpen to a serÂiÂous daguerreotypist.
OlivÂer Mark is tackÂling exactly this blankÂness – and doing it in the midst of art’s holiÂest temples, the museums and galÂlerÂies. The places where blockÂbusters of art hisÂtory usuÂally hang exalÂted on the walls for pleasÂant conÂtemÂplaÂtion. As a rule, the paintÂing is placed at the cenÂter of the vanÂishÂing line, at eye level to the viewÂer, and typÂicÂally in a heavy, decÂorÂatÂive frame – as if the eye did not have enough visuÂal guidÂance already. The paintÂing is forced upon the viewÂer. And like airÂport archiÂtecÂture, the visitor’s path inevÂitÂably always ends up in the duty-free secÂtion of the canÂon of art, the artÂwork itself filling the specÂtrum of perÂcepÂtion. It canÂnot be overlooked.
Mark, howÂever, does overÂlook it, he posÂiÂtions his camÂera at floor level and takes picÂtures from a worm’s eye view, using only his walÂlet as a triÂpod. The angle of the lens and thus the view field is adjusÂted by adding or removÂing a few coins. If this is not a razor-sharp anaÂlysÂis of the art marÂket and a bitÂing criÂtique of the interÂpretÂive sovÂerÂeignty of money, then I’ll eat a critÂicÂal comÂplete ediÂtion of Bazon Brock. Or, maybe Mark just stumbled and fell, or found himÂself in the micro-world of the micro-verse like the physÂicÂally shrinkÂing protÂagÂonÂist in Jack Arnold’s clasÂsic film about 1950s paraÂnoia, “The IncredÂible ShrinkÂing Man.” Or, maybe Mark’s back just hurts and he’s makÂing the best of the situÂation before getÂting to the osteoÂpath. But I digress.
RegardÂless of how he arrived at this view field, his phoÂtoÂgraphs alter our perÂcepÂtion. SudÂdenly, othÂer details move into the spotÂlight: elecÂtricÂal outÂlets, proÂtectÂive grilles, humidÂiÂfiÂers, fire hoses, emerÂgency exit signs, baseÂboards, spacers, and emptiÂness. The unexÂcitÂingÂness of whiteÂwashed monoÂchrome walls, cracked edges, or dark-colored walls that reveal only a small segÂment of the paintÂing that the wall was built for. Instead of conÂtemÂplatÂing a de Chirico, I lose myself in the Capri blue of the wall paint domÂinÂant in the phoÂtoÂgraph. Just not acknowÂledging anyÂthing, just enjoyÂing the chill-out zone of the Pantone rave, ignorÂing the gravÂitas of the paintÂing, takÂing in the emptiÂness with my eyes.
This has more than a medÂitÂatÂive effect, it reconÂtexÂtuÂalÂizes the art. The moment you become aware of the supÂportÂing mechÂanÂisms of the presentÂaÂtion modÂus – the movÂable walls, barÂriÂers, motion detectÂors, benches – Benjamin’s aura of the oriÂginÂal disÂapÂpears. The work of art appears as a comÂmodÂity alongÂside othÂers: here a sockÂet, there a RenaisÂsance. One recogÂnizes again that art funcÂtions simÂilÂarly to paper money: Its artiÂfacts are charged with meanÂing, but their materÂiÂal value is often relÂatÂively low. Their value lies in the comÂmon agreeÂment that the art work in quesÂtion is of relevance.
And in the angle of view. We are a visuÂally drivÂen speÂcies. Out of sight out of mind does not only apply to small chilÂdren. We conÂstruct realÂity through the optic nerve much more than through feelÂing or hearÂing. The IconÂic Turn and all that. If you take away the icons from the IconÂic Turn, would it still exist? Or does Wazlawick’s verÂdict, that we canÂnot not comÂmuÂnicÂate, also apply to art? You canÂnot not depict. Does that make Malevich’s Black Square natÂurÂalÂism, symÂbolÂism, abstracÂtion or a preÂlimÂinÂary study for the colÂor swatches in the printÂing industry? We are fasÂcinÂated by the magic of the simple, solÂid tone. Our brain is always searchÂing for recogÂnizÂabÂilÂity, and the absence of patÂtern is jarÂring. StarÂing at the wall: OlivÂer Mark has givÂen new meanÂing to the idiom – and has made me want to view everything from a cross-legged seated posÂiÂtion the next time I visÂit a museum.
Till Schröder, EditÂor-in-Chief of MarÂginÂaliÂen and ownÂer of the GretanÂton VerÂlag.